ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Patch Test Preparations: Basis and State-of-the-Art Modern Diagnostic Tools for Contact Allergy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable quality of epicutaneous patch test (PT) preparations is a prerequisite for establishing a robust diagnosis in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis due to delayed-type sensitization. It is difficult to identify potential quality issues in daily practice, since confirmatory methods are lacking and assessment of PT-relevance is predominantly based on patients' history and exposure. The quality of PT products can be affected, e.g., by the properties of the active substance, an insufficient development of the PT preparation or issues during manufacturing. Resulting quality deficiencies can cause both false-negative and false-positive test results. As PT preparations are medicinal products according to Directive 2001/83/EC, they require a marketing authorization (MA) entailing assessment of quality, safety and efficacy by the competent authorities. The corresponding product dossier is the basis for MA. It is continuously updated, e.g., upon change of a source material supplier, ensuring comparability of the respective product over time. Compliance with regulatory requirements is a crucial foundation for sustainable quality to prevent product deficiencies, ensuring reliable test results in practice. Harmonization across the EU is important to ensure the widespread availability of high-quality PT products. This review presents the MA requirements of PT preparations in the EU, as well as challenges previously reported by physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.