ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood Serum Eyedrops for the Treatment of Severe Dry Eye Disease Patients.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human allogeneic umbilical cord blood serum stands out as a potent adjunct to conventional therapies for ocular surface disorders related to severe Dry Eye Disease. By expediting ocular surface regeneration and fostering epithelial integrity, umbilical cord blood serum not only enhances subjective patient experiences but also improves objective clinical indicators. This makes it particularly useful in patients with corneal ulcers through ocular surface regeneration and anti-inflammatory activity. This retrospective, interventional, non-randomized clinical study aims to explore the efficacy of allogenic umbilical cord blood serum in patients who had previously received other treatments unsuccessfully. This study was a retrospective, non-comparative, interventional clinical study involving 55 patients (35 females and 20 males) aged 18-82 years with severe Dry Eye Disease who were unresponsive to standard treatments. The study was conducted at Eye Center "G.B. Morgagni-DSV", Catania, Italy. Patients were categorized based on the etiology of severe Dry Eye Disease into four groups: group I consisted of 26 patients with filamentary keratitis and corneal ulcers associated with rheumatologic diseases such as Sjogren's syndrome and systemic sclerosis; group II comprised 15 patients with graft-versus-host disease; group III consisted of 10 patients with corneal neurotrophic ulcers; group IV included four patients with Steven-Johnson syndrome. Outcomes evaluated before and after treatment were OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) Questionnaires, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), Slit-Lamp Examination, Esthesiometry, Lissamine Green Staining, NIBUT (Non-Invasive Break-Up Time) and BUT, Fluorescein Staining with Photography and Oxford Classification, Schirmer Test, Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Meibography. We observed a significant improvement in SANDE, VAS and OSDI questionnaires, Schirmer Test, BUT, BCVA, and Oxford classification after treatment with allogeneic cord blood serum eyedrops. Clinical variables, such as corneal inflammation, conjunctivalization, corneal neovascularization, or pain, were also considered individually. Nevertheless, pain and inflammation reduced markedly over time until completely healed in all cases. Our study highlights the remarkable efficacy of allogeneic cord blood serum eyedrops in patients with severe Dry Eye Disease who have shown absent or inadequate response to usual treatments for dry eye. This underscores the need for further comprehensive investigations in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.