ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Topical Ruxolitinib and Delgocitinib Versus Systemic JAK Inhibitors: A Comparative Safety Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled phase Ia clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of tofacitinib tartrate cream (HZ-J001) in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Beyond Cytotoxicity: Hair Follicle Immune Privilege Collapse and JAK-STAT Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- MDI1228, a topical pan-JAK inhibitor, disrupts dermal fibroblast-T cell chemokine crosstalk to resolve allergic contact and atopic dermatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) represent a novel class of drugs for the treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Topical JAKi (t-JAKi) offer targeted therapy at potentially reduced systemic side effects and improved long-term safety compared to systemic JAKi (s-JAKi). This narrative review assesses the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of currently available t-JAKi, ruxolitinib and delgocitinib, with a comparative analysis to s-JAKi. Pharmacokinetic data show that topical ruxolitinib achieves effective dermal concentrations, with minimal systemic exposure. Clinical trials consistently report low rates of adverse events, primarily application-site reactions, while systemic events such as upper respiratory tract infections occur at rates comparable to placebo. Data on delgocitinib similarly indicate negligible systemic absorption and a favorable safety profile. Taken together, these findings suggest that t-JAKi may represent safer alternatives to s-JAKi for selected patients with localized inflammatory skin diseases, particularly those with comorbidities or heightened systemic risk. Long-term studies and real-world evidence are needed to confirm sustained safety and guide their optimal integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.