ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Atypical Presentations and Molecular Diagnosis of Ocular Bartonellosis.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe unusual findings and management of neuroretinitis in patients with cat scratch disease (CSD), their functional outcome after a case-oriented treatment was anaylsed, and the current literature was reviewed. A retrospective monocentric case series and a literature review. Review of medical records, multimodal imaging, and literature review. Five patients (four females and one male) with a mean age of 29.75 years (range: 11-71 years) had unusual findings of ocular bartonellosis, including inner retinitis, focal choroiditis, retinal microaneurysms, and bilateral sectorial optic nerve swelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.