Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41226450›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Self-Guided Molecular Simulation Methods.

Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R Brooks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiongwu WuLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9883-7241
Bernard R BrooksLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HL001051-28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work reviews self-guided (SG) molecular simulation methods and illustrates the characteristics and applications of these methods through several example simulations. The main characteristic of SG methods is that past motion in simulations is used to guide future motion. Two forms of these methods are self-guided molecular dynamics (SGMD) and self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD). SG methods achieve an enhanced conformational search through promoting low-frequency motion. A simple local averaging scheme is used to extract low-frequency properties from past simulation trajectories to promote low-frequency motion, which significantly enhances conformational search efficiency with little overhead in computing cost. Based on a generalized Langevin equation (GLE), an SGLD-GLE simulation method is developed, which has enhanced conformational searching ability and at the same time can vigorously sample the canonical ensemble. A reformulation of the SG methods leads to a quantitative relation between the guiding parameters and the conformational distribution, which allows the SG methods to be combined with the replica exchange scheme to perform replica-exchanging self-guided simulations (RXSGMD/RXSGLD). RXSGMD/RXSGLD are much more efficient than temperature-based replica exchange methods, especially for large systems.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAlgorithmsconformation samplingconformation searchLangevin dynamicsmolecular dynamicsmolecular simulationreplica-exchangingself-guided Langevin dynamicsself-guided molecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41226450
PMCPMC12607963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.