ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Natural Killer Cell Activity and Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative Changes in Peripheral Natural Killer Cell Activity and Their Association With Clinicopathological Features in Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Hydroquinidine Modulates Histopathological, Inflammatory, Apoptotic, EMT-Related, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR-Associated Markers in a DMH-Induced Rat Model of Colon Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No validated biomarkers are available to monitor neoadjuvant treatment effects for breast cancer. Natural killer cell activity (NKA) has shown prognostic potential in other cancers. This study examined the association between NKA and treatment response. Patients had blood samples collected at baseline, before each treatment, and pre- and postoperatively. Plasma IFNγ levels were measured by ELISA as a surrogate marker of NKA, with 250 pg/mL as the cutoff for normal versus low NKA. Study endpoints were residual cancer burden (RCB) class, overall survival (OS), and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Seventy-eight patients were included. The five-year IDFS was 88.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7-94.9%) for patients with normal NKA versus 71.5% (95% CI 40.6-88.2%) for patients with low NKA (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.