Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41226318›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Circulating Molecular Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of NSCLC-A Review.

Wojciech Jelski, Sylwia Okrasinska, Weronika Rutkowska, Barbara Mroczko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wojciech JelskiDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Sylwia OkrasinskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, University Hospital, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Weronika RutkowskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, University Hospital, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Barbara MroczkoDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4075-8479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a severe disease with a very poor prognosis. Some 30-80% of patients with NSCLC die within five years of cancer diagnosis. The main factors contributing to this condition are the lack of effective markers for diagnosing cancer at an early stage, as well as the complexity of the biological processes involved in tumorigenesis and progression. The development of knowledge regarding all aspects of NSCLC has provided information used in the detection, systemic anticancer therapy and monitoring of NSCLC, which has a significant impact on prognosis and quality of life. NSCLCs release various biological substances into the bloodstream. Liquid biopsies allow for the analysis of tumor components in body fluids, and the usefulness of these biopsy tests as a substitute for tumor tissue is increasing. In this article, we critically review the available literature on microRNAs, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs), and metabolomic and proteomic markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of NSCLC. However, the usefulness of these new markers in clinical practice has significant limitations.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsExtracellular VesiclesHumansLiquid BiopsyMicroRNAsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsMicroRNAsnon-small cell lung cancertumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41226318
PMCPMC12607587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.