ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lung Ultrasound in Pediatrics: A Review with Core Principles That Every User Should Know.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretation of Lung Ultrasound in POCUS.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- POCUS for the general pediatrician: a narrative review of practical applications, policy, and training.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Dynamic bedside lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of neonatal lung abscess: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a valuable diagnostic modality for the evaluation of respiratory disorders in neonates, infants and children. LUS has high diagnostic accuracy for identification of lung lesions in neonates, infants and children, where most lung lesions abut the pleura. Furthermore, LUS has the advantage of rapid execution and ease of use, and does not require ionizing radiation. Its sensitivity, cost-effectiveness, and clinical efficiency make it an important tool for supporting clinical decision-making and improving patient management. Moreover, LUS may represent a reliable alternative to chest radiography for the assessment of pediatric lung conditions and, in selected cases, could potentially replace routine chest X-rays (CXRs). Because LUS is a user-friendly technique that enables real-time imaging without radiation, it has increasingly been used in clinical practice in recent years. Here, we discuss the diagnostic role of LUS for the accurate identification of pulmonary lesions in pediatric patients. In addition, we present LUS sonographic findings associated with common pediatric lung diseases, including signs and artifacts that can be used during diagnosis and evaluation of pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.