Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41226067›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Two Cases of Singular Sacral S1 Butterfly Vertebra.

Arturs Balodis, Roberts Tumelkans, Cenk Eraslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arturs BalodisInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-1901
Roberts TumelkansFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0007-2893-2829
Cenk EraslanRadiology Department, Ege University, 35040 Bornova, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A butterfly vertebra is an uncommon but clinically and radiologically significant pathology. The etiological factor of this pathology is a congenital defect in the formation of the vertebral body during embryogenesis, resulting in a cleft within the vertebral body that, in an X-ray, resembles the shape of a butterfly. Butterfly vertebrae are most often found in the thoracic and lumbar spine and more rarely in the sacral region. The clinical manifestations of this condition do not differ from the symptoms of other diseases, and it may also be asymptomatic. Only the recognition of its characteristic radiologic signs allows for accurate and timely diagnosis, as well as differentiation from other pathological processes such as fractures, metastases, and inflammation. In these cases, magnetic resonance imaging is the first-choice method. An important aspect in recognizing this pathology is its correlation with other congenital syndromes, even in cases of a single vertebral defect. We present 2 cases with an isolated S1 butterfly vertebra. The first is a 47-year-old male who presented to the hospital with complaints of chronic pain in the lower back and sacral region, more pronounced on the right side. The second is of a 39-year-old male who also presented to the hospital with chronic pain. All diagnostic modalities for this pathology have been used to demonstrate high-quality pictures, including X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingsacral butterfly vertebravertebral anomaly

Identifiers

PMID41226067
PMCPMC12610111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.