ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the History of Hepatic Vein Catheterization.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Unifying and unique roles of non-coding RNA biomarkers in liver and heart fibrosis.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Review
- Advances in Precise Assessment of Portal Pressure in Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Review
- Changing Etiological Patterns and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Decompensated Cirrhosis: A 10-Year Cohort Study Before and After COVID-19.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Noninvasive multimodal management of portal hypertension: from early screening to precision clinical decision-making.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) imposes a major global health burden, with portal hypertension (PH) and its complications driven by complex pathophysiological mechanisms. Understanding these processes is essential for effective therapy. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension, providing key diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic guidance-particularly in distinguishing its type and monitoring response to treatments such as non-selective beta-blockers. While non-invasive tests like elastography and serum biomarkers are valuable for screening and follow-up, they cannot fully replace HVPG when precise measurement is needed. HVPG contains not only prognostic information but also helps to decide if pharmacological therapy is indicated and to monitor therapeutic effects with reductions correlating with improved outcomes. In this review, we highlight the comprehensive management of patients with PH and the indications for measurement of HVPG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.