ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning in MRI Brain Imaging: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dual-Branch Frequency-Aware Attention Framework for Rare Neurological Disease Classification from Brain MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used in many fields, including medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive and effective diagnostic technique; however, manual image analysis is time-consuming and prone to human variability. In response, ML models have been developed to support MRI analysis, particularly in segmentation and classification tasks. This work presents an updated narrative review of ML applications in brain MRI, with a focus on tumor classification and segmentation. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus databases and Mendeley Catalog (MC)-a publicly accessible bibliographic catalog linked to Elsevier's Scopus indexing system-covering the period from January 2020 to April 2025. The included studies focused on patients with primary or secondary brain neoplasms and applied machine learning techniques to MRI data for classification or segmentation purposes. Only original research articles written in English and reporting model validation were considered. Studies using animal models, non-imaging data, lacking proper validation, or without accessible full texts (e.g., abstract-only records or publications unavailable through institutional access) were excluded. In total, 108 studies met all inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively. In general, models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were found to dominate current research due to their ability to extract spatial features directly from imaging data. Reported classification accuracies ranged from 95% to 99%, while Dice coefficients for segmentation tasks varied between 0.83 and 0.94. Hybrid architectures (e.g., CNN-SVM, CNN-LSTM) achieved strong results in both classification and segmentation tasks, with accuracies above 95% and Dice scores around 0.90. Transformer-based models, such as the Swin Transformer, reached the highest performance, up to 99.9%. Despite high reported accuracy, challenges remain regarding overfitting, generalization to real-world clinical data, and lack of standardized evaluation protocols. Transfer learning and data augmentation were frequently applied to mitigate limited data availability, while radiomics-based models introduced new avenues for personalized diagnostics. ML has demonstrated substantial potential in enhancing brain MRI analysis and supporting clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, further progress requires rigorous clinical validation, methodological standardization, and comparative benchmarking to bridge the gap between research settings and practical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.