Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225885›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparison of Mask-R-CNN and Thresholding-Based Segmentation for High-Throughput Phenotyping of Walnut Kernel Color.

Steven H Lee, Sean McDowell, Charles Leslie, Kristina McCreery, Mason Earles, Patrick J Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven H LeeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sean McDowellViticulture and Enology, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Charles LeslieDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Kristina McCreeryDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Mason EarlesViticulture and Enology, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Patrick J BrownDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1332-711X

Funding

California Walnut Board NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput phenotyping has become essential for plant breeding programs, replacing traditional methods that rely on subjective scales influenced by human judgment. Machine learning (ML) computer vision systems have successfully used convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image segmentation, providing greater flexibility than thresholding methods that may require carefully staged images. This study compares two quantitative image analysis methods, rule-based thresholding using the magick package in R and an instance-segmentation pipeline based on the widely used Mask-R-CNN architecture, and then compares the output of each to two different sets of human evaluations. Walnuts were collected over three years from over 3000 individual trees maintained by the UC Davis walnut breeding program. The resulting 90,961 kernels were placed into 100-cell trays and imaged using a 20-megapixel Basler camera with a Sony IMX183 sensor. Quantitative data from both image analysis methods were highly correlated for both lightness (L*; r

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer visionhigh throughput phenotypingimage analysismachine learningplant breedingprecision agriculturewalnut

Identifiers

PMID41225885
PMCPMC12610562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.