Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225754›Full record

ArticlePublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

Public Health Professionals' Perceptions on Intertwin Relationship in Multiple-Birth Family Nursing.

Kristiina Heinonen, Tuulikki Trias, Jaakko Kaprio, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristiina HeinonenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-7927
Tuulikki TriasCentro Lapsi, centro de psiquiatría, psicoterapia y psicología perinatal, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaakko KaprioUniversity of Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Katri Vehviläinen-JulkunenDepartment of Nursing Science, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe how dominance, submissiveness, and speaking role appear in the intertwin relationship between twins under 7 years old. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: A cross-sectional study design was used. The respondents (n = 72) were nurses. Information about the intertwin relationship was explored through Likert-scale statements and open-ended questions. This article reports the open-ended questions that were analyzed by content analysis.

resultsDominance, submissiveness, and the speaking role appear in twins' behavior. The twins take different roles, such as the space taker, the decision maker, the follower on the sidelines, the helper, or the recipient of help. Twins can interact as either being brave and visible or withdraw into the background. The quality of intertwin relationships manifests in daily life situations, which brings opportunities to observe, guide, and support the children's individuality and balance the intertwin relationship.

conclusionsTo continue to support the growth and development of multiples in maternity and child health clinics, nurses need to have knowledge of the relationship between twins and the leadership, submissiveness, and speaking role associated with it. Work and guidance in nursing must be evidence-based.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily NursingPublic Health NursingTwinsAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescompetenceintertwin relationshipmidwifemultiple‐birth familynursenursingparenthoodtwins

Identifiers

PMID41225754
PMCPMC12968476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.