ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Natural Selection in Transcription Factor-DNA Interaction Motifs: A Comparative and Population Genomics Perspective.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural selection heavily influences the evolutionary trajectories of species by impacting their genotype-to-phenotype transitions. On the molecular level, these transitions are shaped by the regulatory sequences. In this study, we employed a combination of population and comparative genomics to investigate how natural selection affects specific regulatory sequence classes involved in the regulatory transcription factor-DNA interactions. These interactions consist of two motifs, namely: transcription factor-binding domains and transcription factor-binding sites. Using publicly available annotation data for Homo sapiens, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Drosophila melanogaster, we first constructed the species-specific lists of the transcription factor-binding domain regions. On applying some of the commonly used summary statistics, we found signals of purifying selection acting on transcription factor-binding domains, consistent with their functional importance. Next, using the biochemical assay-based annotations, we identified potential transcription factor-binding site regions and used variants within them as nonsynonymous equivalents. Interestingly, we also observed that noncoding transcription factor-binding site regions showed similar levels of constraint to that of coding regions for populations with large Ne. Signals of positive selection were limited. Nevertheless, McDonald-Kreitman estimates revealed that, in both fruit-fly and thale-cress, α for transcription factor-binding domains was consistently higher than for adjacent nonbinding domains, whereas no such difference was apparent in humans. Taken together, our comparative analysis shows that the efficiency of negative-and to a lesser extent positive-selection on transcription factor-DNA interface elements scales with effective population size. The dataset and analysis pipeline provide a baseline for future studies of regulatory evolution across coding and noncoding regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.