Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225682›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Trajectories and strategies in implementing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for substance use in primary care within public hospitals: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Lina Tieu, Elizabeth Bromley, Rajat Simhan, Roshan Bastani, Beth A Glenn, Nadereh Pourat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina TieuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Lctieu@health.ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9980-0774
Elizabeth BromleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rajat SimhanSan Joaquin Health Centers, French Camp, California, USA.
Roshan BastaniDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Beth A Glenn *Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nadereh Pourat *Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Training Program In Basic & Translational Cardiovascular ScienceT32HL086350 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Martin Cadeiras, David A. Liem · 2008 to 2026
$7.1M
Department of Health Care Services Contract No. 16-93440NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR001883NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL086350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based approach to identify and initiate treatment for alcohol and substance use in primary care settings. Among 22 public hospitals incentivized to implement SBIRT as part of a value-based Medicaid waiver program over five years, this study examined trajectories, strategies, and challenges in standardizing SBIRT within primary care.

methodsThis study utilized data from narrative reports completed by hospital leadership, obtained from the evaluation of the Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi-Cal (PRIME) program in California. Following the Multi-Level Health Outcomes Framework, template analysis was used to characterize SBIRT implementation. Content analysis was used to catalogue implementation strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change Framework. To assess trajectories (i.e., longitudinal implementation outcomes) of SBIRT implementation, we categorized standardized adoption of sequential SBIRT processes (screening only; screening and brief intervention; screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment) and reach (limited vs. full primary care population).

resultsHospitals used a wide variety of measures, personnel, platforms, and workflows in screening for substance use within primary care settings. Brief intervention was conducted by primary care or behavioral health care team members who had received targeted training. Hospitals implemented a wide range of treatment options to address substance use, including referral to co-located or contracted/partnered behavioral health providers. By the end of the first implementation year, only one hospital had standardized screening processes, and none had standardized brief intervention or referral. At the end of the fifth year, 20 of 22 hospitals had standardized screening, 15 had standardized brief intervention, and 12 had standardized referral among their full primary care populations. Strategies and challenges in planning, education, and restructuring processes (e.g., integration of screening processes within electronic health records and clinical workflows) were particularly influential in facilitating implementation.

conclusionsThis study highlighted significant progress made by public hospitals in implementing standardized SBIRT processes among their primary care populations within a value-based program. However, hospitals experienced delays and challenges, highlighting key areas in which additional support or investment may be needed to sustain and promote long-term progress in SBIRT implementation.

Indexed as

AlcoholImplementationPrimary carePublic hospitalsScreening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT)Substance use

Identifiers

PMID41225682
PMCPMC12613847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.