ReviewJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
A review on health system-based surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis: technological advancements, challenges, and outlooks.
Review in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating predictors and barriers to vaccine uptake in children at Konye Health District, South West region Cameroon.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of surveillance performance and determinants for priority vaccine-preventable diseases in Niger State, Nigeria: A CDC 2001 Guideline-based multilevel analysis.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Deep learning model meets community-based surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoliomyelitis is a severe viral infection that can lead to permanent paralysis or death, primarily affecting children under 15 years of age. Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance is essential for global polio eradication efforts, enabling the rapid detection, reporting, and investigation of suspected cases. Implementing various technological solutions has significantly advanced AFP surveillance, which is the gold standard for early polio case identification. These technologies include short message alert systems for better case reporting, the Open Data Kit (ODK) for efficient data collection and management, digital specimen tracking systems for improved sample handling, geospatial mapping tools for monitoring surveillance coverage, and awareness campaigns to engage healthcare workers and communities. Despite these advancements, there remains a notable absence of comprehensive analyses evaluating the cumulative progress, challenges, and policy implications of AFP surveillance. MAIN BODY: This study presents a targeted literature review of English-language publications from 2002 to 2024, focusing on challenges, technological advancements, and practical recommendations for AFP surveillance. Only empirically grounded, methodologically sound studies centered on AFP within health systems were included, with preference for research conducted in polio-endemic countries. Studies lacking methodological rigor or direct relevance were excluded. The review highlights how digital reporting platforms, specimen tracking, geospatial monitoring, and awareness campaigns have strengthened surveillance operations. At the same time, it identifies persisting weaknesses in surveillance methodologies and gaps in coverage, underscoring the need for further innovation and integration into health systems.
conclusionBy synthesizing evidence on the latest developments, this review addresses a critical gap in the literature and provides actionable recommendations to improve AFP surveillance. The findings inform both practice and policy by identifying innovative solutions and future directions, ultimately contributing to stronger global health surveillance systems and advancing polio eradication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.