ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025
Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives for target trial emulation in critical care clinical research.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an ROX index-guided intubation strategy on mortality in patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula: a target trial emulation.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Beyond admission day: operative intent and physiological readiness in rapid chest wall reconstruction.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in acute and critical care: current challenges and strategic solutions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- The 6-hour window: is the sepsis transfer guideline enough?Acute and critical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Target trial emulation (TTE) is a powerful framework for addressing causal questions using observational data. By explicitly designing analyses to mimic a hypothetical randomized trial, TTE enables researchers to more precisely define their research questions, leading to more clinically meaningful conclusions. Its forward-looking design also helps limit common biases, such as immortal time bias and selection bias. Understanding TTE principles is essential not only for researchers working with observational data but also for clinicians who aim to critically interpret the growing number of TTE studies, as well as studies addressing causal questions without explicit use of the TTE framework. In this review, using the timing of switch from controlled to assisted ventilation as a key example, we outline the core assumptions underpinning valid causal inference in TTE: consistency, conditional exchangeability, and positivity. We discuss practical challenges in dynamic critical care settings, including defining a meaningful time zero, handling grace periods, and selecting and properly adjusting for confounders. We also discuss caveats, such as TTE's applicability to non-modifiable interventions, limited applicability for intention-to-treat effects, and the need for high-resolution longitudinal data. Finally, we provide a visual summary linking each trial component to key indicators of high-quality emulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.