ArticleTrials2025
Effect of biopsychosocial model of rehabilitation on functional disability and pain in patients after robotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgery.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rate and prevalence of lumbar fusion surgeries are rapidly increasing, and these procedures effectively treat spinal disorders. Biological, psychological, and social factors play important roles in postoperative rehabilitation. Robotic-assisted surgeries reduce postoperative morbidities, and postoperative outcomes can be improved by interventions targeting biopsychosocial factors along with rehabilitation. Hence, this study aimed to determine the effect of biopsychosocial model of rehabilitation on pain in patients after robotic-assisted lumbar fusion surgery.
methodsAn assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will recruit 136 participants, and randomly allocate the participants into two groups. The intervention group will follow the biopsychosocial rehabilitation model, whereas the control group will be subjected to a routine standard protocol. Assessments will be done at baseline, 2, 4, and 12 weeks post-surgery. The normality of the data will be evaluated using the Shapiro‒Wilk test and analysis of variance with repeated measures or General linear models for intergroup differences. This protocol follows all required ethical guidelines. DISCUSSION: This study will address the importance of the biological, psychological and sociological factors of rehabilitation. Analysis of the study results will provide insights into the importance of the biopsychosocial rehabilitation model of rehabilitation in patients after lumbar fusion.
trial registrationCTRI, CTRI/2024/12/077598. Registered on 03 December 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.