Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225621›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025

Analysis of the economic benefits and feasibility of the same-city delivery model for donor human milk (SCDM-DHM).

Dingding Yin, Yang Yi, Kangmei Huang, Yijun Chen, Huali Zheng, Ping Zhou, Lian Zhang, Zhangbin Yu, Quanfu Zhang, Junhong Cai and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dingding YinNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Yang YiNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Kangmei HuangNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Yijun ChenNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Huali ZhengNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Ping ZhouNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Lian ZhangNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China.
Zhangbin YuDepartment of Neonatology, The Second Clinical Medical College, The First Affiliated Hospital, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China.
Quanfu ZhangNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China. szzhqf@126.com.
Junhong CaiNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China. hyjs888@126.com.
Ruirui XingDepartment of Neonatology, The Second Clinical Medical College, The First Affiliated Hospital, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Jinan University, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, China. 493035721@qq.com.
Kanghua ZhouNeonatology, Shenzhen Baoan Women' s and Children' s Hospital; Obstetric and Paediatric Centre [Shenzhen] under Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence (HOPE), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518101, China. 1349228077@qq.com.

Funding

2024 Annual Research Project of Guangdong Health Economics Association 2024-WJMZ-162024 Research Project on High-Quality Development of District-Affiliated Public Hospitals BAGZL2024155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen mother's own milk (MOM) is insufficient, feeding very preterm infants with donor human milk (DHM) reduces the incidence of multiple severe complications and provides greater benefits than infant formula. Donor human milk (DHM) is obtained from breast milk banks, but establishing a human milk bank is very expensive. We propose a same-city delivery model for donor human milk (SCDM-DHM), where DHM is delivered via a cold chain from milk banks to NICUs without milk bank facilities, providing DHM to very preterm infants (VPIs).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of VPIs who were admitted to Shenzhen People's Hospital between June 2023 and May 2025. We initiated the same-city delivery model for donor human milk (SCDM-DHM) in July 2024, providing DHM to VPIs born from June 2024 onward. We designated VPIs admitted from June 2023-June 2024 as the control group and those admitted from June 2024-May 2025 as the SCDM-DHM group. The economic benefits for both the human milk bank and recipient hospitals within the SCDM-DHM were evaluated, and clinical outcomes were assessed in VPIs receiving DHM in recipient hospital NICU.

resultsOur cost analysis revealed that the cost of the human milk bank is much greater than the cost of the recipient hospital ($526,576.40 vs. $279.58). The recipient hospital's cost per liter DHM ($25.34) is much lower than that of the human milk bank ($44.94). Our data revealed that after DHM was introduced, the breastfeeding rate of VPIs in recipient hospital NICU was higher (50.8% vs. 92.9%, p < 0.001, SMD=-1.09). The incidence of NEC (≥ Stage II) (6.7% vs. 3.5%) was not significantly different (p = 0.679, SMD = 0.14) from that in the control group, with a complete absence of adverse events.

conclusionsThe SCDM-DHM is an adaptation of existing international approaches to the unique infrastructure and policy environment in China. The SCDM-DHM improved breastfeeding rate in the NICU without a human milk bank and remained cost-efficient, demonstrating both feasibility and clinical effectiveness. However, more research is needed to confirm whether the SCDM-DHM can be promoted among NICUs in Shenzhen and other regions as well.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMilk BanksMilk, HumanAdultChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleRetrospective StudiesBreastmilk feeding ratesDonor human milkNecrotizing enterocolitisVery preterm infants

Identifiers

PMID41225621
PMCPMC12613762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.