SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Basket trials in rare diseases: a systematic review of current practices, methodological challenges, and future directions.
Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Case for Master Protocols for Rare Neurological Diseases.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
- Optimizing the Efficacy-Toxicity Paradigm in Pediatric Oncology: A Narrative Review of Immunotherapy and Survivorship Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Targeting the GSK-3β/mTOR axis to overcome chemoresistance in gestational choriocarcinoma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Correction: Basket trials in rare diseases: a systematic review of current practices, methodological challenges, and future directions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Rare disease clinical trials in Italy (2022-May 2026): current trends, future challenges, and the evolving role as reporting member state.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma in pediatric and adolescent patients: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Outcome strategies for clinical trials in Neuropaediatric rare diseases.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of therapies for rare diseases (RDs) continues to face persistent challenges, including small and geographically dispersed patient populations, pronounced clinical heterogeneity, and the absence of standardized outcome measures. Basket trials-master protocol studies evaluating a single therapeutic intervention across multiple diseases linked by shared molecular or clinical characteristics-offer a promising solution to these constraints. This systematic review identified 36 basket trials targeting RDs through comprehensive searches of clinical trial registries, academic databases, and grey literature. The majority (75%) focused on rare oncological indications, with only nine trials addressing non-oncological RDs. These non-oncological studies were highly heterogeneous, spread across 25 distinct conditions without overlap, and faced persistent challenges such as the lack of validated biomarkers and standardized endpoints. Most studies (81%) were Phase II trials, highlighting the exploratory role of basket designs in early-stage development. Trial designs were predominantly non-randomized and open-label (86%), reflecting the practical limitations of implementing rigorous methodologies in small, heterogeneous populations. The average trial duration was 6.5 years, and recruitment was logistically demanding, with trials involving a mean of 56 sites and, in some cases, over 1,000 centers. While basket trials show clear potential to accelerate therapeutic innovation in RDs, their application remains limited beyond oncology. Methodological constraints-such as inconsistent endpoints, limited randomization, and underpowered subgroup analyses-continue to restrict their broader use. Enhancing the utility of basket trials will require greater regulatory flexibility, wider adoption of adaptive and Bayesian designs, integration of real-world evidence, and stronger engagement with patients and advocacy groups. This review underscores both the opportunities and limitations of basket trials in RDs and provides a roadmap for realizing their potential, calling for concerted efforts from regulators, researchers, and patient advocates to expand their application and impact across the RDs spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.