ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Deciphering context-specific Axitinib escape pathways via multi-omics and explainable machine learning.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResistance remains a major barrier to targeted cancer therapies. Axitinib, a VEGF receptor inhibitor with anti-angiogenic activity, is effective in several cancers but shows heterogeneous patient responses, reflecting context-specific molecular adaptations. A comprehensive multi-omics approach is needed to define these mechanisms and uncover compensatory survival pathways limiting Axitinib efficacy. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a high-throughput analysis of ~ 1000 pan-cancer cell lines treated with 44 FDA-approved targeted drugs. Basal transcriptomic (~ 36,000 transcripts) and proteomic (~ 9000 proteins) profiles were integrated to predict cell-line-specific drug response using a multi-classifier machine learning framework. Multiple models, including ensemble, linear, and kernel-based classifiers, were trained per drug and evaluated via fivefold cross-validation. Axitinib, the best-predictive drug, was further analyzed using explainable AI (LIME) to identify resistance-driving features for each cell line. Resistant cell lines were clustered using agglomerative hierarchical clustering based on LIME-identified features and highly correlated partners. Optimal clusters were determined via silhouette scoring. Enrichment analysis, pathway annotation, and literature mining were used to uncover cluster-specific resistance mechanisms.
resultsAxitinib achieved the highest predictive accuracy across all 44 drugs. The machine learning pipeline reliably classified cell lines as resistant or sensitive from basal transcriptomic and proteomic data. LIME identified key resistance-driving features at the individual cell line level. Clustering based on these features revealed two resistance subtypes shaped by tissue origin and survival constraints. In blood-derived cancers, resistance involves purine metabolism rewiring and alternative growth factor signaling to sustain proliferation. In solid tumors, resistance reflected adaptation to hypoxia, including ECM remodeling, mechanosensing, EMT, immune evasion, and senescence-induced paracrine signaling.
conclusionAxitinib resistance emerges through tissue- and context-specific adaptations. Multi-omics profiling with explainable machine learning reveals distinct survival strategies, underscoring the need for precision re-sensitization approaches tailored to tumor context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.