Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225601›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Deciphering context-specific Axitinib escape pathways via multi-omics and explainable machine learning.

Samriddhi Gupta, Khyati Patni, Simarpreet Kaur, Jaspreet Kaur Dhanjal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samriddhi Gupta *Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), New Delhi, 110020, India.
Khyati Patni *Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), New Delhi, 110020, India.
Simarpreet KaurSchool of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram (IISER TVM), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India.
Jaspreet Kaur DhanjalDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IIIT-Delhi), New Delhi, 110020, India. jaspreet@iiitd.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-3063

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/12/IYBA/2020/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance remains a major barrier to targeted cancer therapies. Axitinib, a VEGF receptor inhibitor with anti-angiogenic activity, is effective in several cancers but shows heterogeneous patient responses, reflecting context-specific molecular adaptations. A comprehensive multi-omics approach is needed to define these mechanisms and uncover compensatory survival pathways limiting Axitinib efficacy. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a high-throughput analysis of ~ 1000 pan-cancer cell lines treated with 44 FDA-approved targeted drugs. Basal transcriptomic (~ 36,000 transcripts) and proteomic (~ 9000 proteins) profiles were integrated to predict cell-line-specific drug response using a multi-classifier machine learning framework. Multiple models, including ensemble, linear, and kernel-based classifiers, were trained per drug and evaluated via fivefold cross-validation. Axitinib, the best-predictive drug, was further analyzed using explainable AI (LIME) to identify resistance-driving features for each cell line. Resistant cell lines were clustered using agglomerative hierarchical clustering based on LIME-identified features and highly correlated partners. Optimal clusters were determined via silhouette scoring. Enrichment analysis, pathway annotation, and literature mining were used to uncover cluster-specific resistance mechanisms.

resultsAxitinib achieved the highest predictive accuracy across all 44 drugs. The machine learning pipeline reliably classified cell lines as resistant or sensitive from basal transcriptomic and proteomic data. LIME identified key resistance-driving features at the individual cell line level. Clustering based on these features revealed two resistance subtypes shaped by tissue origin and survival constraints. In blood-derived cancers, resistance involves purine metabolism rewiring and alternative growth factor signaling to sustain proliferation. In solid tumors, resistance reflected adaptation to hypoxia, including ECM remodeling, mechanosensing, EMT, immune evasion, and senescence-induced paracrine signaling.

conclusionAxitinib resistance emerges through tissue- and context-specific adaptations. Multi-omics profiling with explainable machine learning reveals distinct survival strategies, underscoring the need for precision re-sensitization approaches tailored to tumor context.

Indexed as

AxitinibImidazolesIndazolesMachine LearningProteomicsSignal TransductionCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression ProfilingHumansMultiomicsTranscriptomeAxitinibImidazolesIndazolesAxitinibDrug resistanceExplainable AIMachine learningMolecular targeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID41225601
PMCPMC12613443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.