ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Pain assessment and treatment in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses: a French multicentric pediatric study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of rare genetic lysosomal storage disorders with a wide spectrum of clinical severities. Chronic pain is frequent but difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection and management of pain in pediatric MPS patients.
methodsPain-related data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of pediatric MPS patients from five French centers for inborn metabolic disorders. A national online survey was also conducted about the feelings of patients and/or their families and of healthcare professionals about the detection and management of pain in pediatric MPS patients.
resultsThe medical records of 48 patients with all subtypes of MPS were analyzed. Pain was frequent and recurrent in MPS patients (pain was reported in 94% of the patients), but it was undoubtedly difficult to assess. We observed important differences between (1) medical records demonstrating frequent assessment and treatment of pain, (2) feelings of patients or their families (53 questionnaires) reporting frequent pain, and (3) feelings of healthcare professionals (21 questionnaires) who were quite satisfied with their own practices, suggesting that the majority of patients were unpainful. We recommend a more systematic evaluation of pain, particularly for outpatients, with the use of adapted tools, notably in children with disabilities, and with a multidimensional approach to pain assessment and management. Caregiver training is also needed, and close collaboration with pain centers is encouraged.
conclusionA routine pain assessment protocol for MPS patients is required that covers the entire spectrum of pain and can be adapted for every type of patient, including those with neurocognitive and motor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.