ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
Epigenetic profiles of response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment resistant depression.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Critical Review of Longitudinal DNA Methylomic Changes Associated with Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Potential Epigenetic Mechanisms of High-Frequency rTMS in the Treatment of Major Depression: A Brief Report of Current Evidence.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), yet response rates remain suboptimal and biomarkers predictive of treatment outcomes are currently lacking. Recently, DNA methylation (DNAm) has shown promise as an epigenetic predictor of antidepressant and electroconvulsive therapy treatment outcomes but no study to our knowledge has characterized DNAm profiles of treatment outcomes in the context of TMS. Here, we present the first genome-scale DNAm analysis of TMS outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
methodsPeripheral blood samples from 60 TRD patients were collected prior to a standard 36-session TMS course. DNAm was profiled using the Illumina EPIC array and filtered to retain only the top 5% most variable probes for subsequent analysis in relation to three treatment outcomes in an analytic sample of 46 patients: treatment response (> 50% PHQ-9 reduction), symptom trajectory (ΔPHQ-9), and remission (PHQ-9 < 5).
resultsMethylated CpG Set Enrichment Analysis (mCSEA) identified 67, 23, and 163 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with treatment response, symptom trajectory, and remission, respectively (FDR < 0.05). Sixteen DMRs were common across all outcomes, implicating genes involved in neurodevelopment (HOXA4, HOXA5), immune signaling (RUNX1, OTUD5), and synaptic function (EFNB1, RAP2C). Targeted analysis of 84 CpGs in the BDNF promoter revealed 10 nominally significant CpGs that differentiated responders from non-responders. Several DMRs showed strong blood-brain methylation concordance (r > 0.5), supporting their potential relevance to central nervous system mechanisms.
conclusionsDespite the limited sample size, these findings suggest distinct epigenetic signatures prior to treatment that are associated with TMS outcomes, supporting the potential utility of DNAm as a biomarker for response stratification in TRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.