ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Usefulness of protocol-based pharmacotherapy management by pharmacists in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA team-based approach is essential to provide cancer patients with high-quality treatment. To ensure the best possible care while reducing the workload of physicians, Ehime University Hospital has introduced three protocol-based pharmacotherapy management (PBPM) strategies in the field of chemotherapy. First, we introduced PBPM to avoid reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy. In this PBPM strategy, pharmacists added laboratory test orders for patients who require regular HBV-DNA quantification (HBV-PBPM). Second, we devised PBPM for measurement of the urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPC) in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Finally, we introduced PBPM for measurement of serum magnesium in patients receiving anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy (Mg-PBPM). In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of these three PBPM strategies in outpatients receiving chemotherapy.
methodsThe study included patients treated in the outpatient chemotherapy unit between July 2021 and February 2023. Rates of compliance with laboratory tests in the 6 months before and after introduction of PBPM were compared.
resultsCompliance with HBV-DNA quantification improved significantly from 66.3% before PBPM to 86.7% after implementation of PBPM (p = 0.002). The median duration of noncompliance was significantly shorter after initiation of PBPM (p = 0.021). Compliance with measurement of UPC was already greater than 95% before PBPM and showed no change after implementation (98.7% pre-PBPM vs 99.3% post-PBPM). Compliance with measurement of serum magnesium improved from 95.8% pre-PBPM to 99.2% after starting PBPM, but the improvement was not statistically significant.
conclusionsIntroduction of PBPM improves compliance with the laboratory tests required in cancer patients during chemotherapy and enables safer delivery of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.