ArticleVirology journal2025
Comparison of boiling versus magnetic bead techniques in nucleic acid extraction for human papillomavirus detection: evidence based 17,179 cases.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePresent study aimed to compare the boiling and magnetic bead nucleic acid extraction method for HPV genotypes detection.
methodsBy mixing hemoglobin with HPV positive quality control products, the anti-interference ability of two nucleic acid extraction methods on hemoglobin was simulated. Subsequently, on the basis of paired small sample and longitudinal large sample comparisons, the HPV detection rates between the boiling and magnetic bead-based method were evaluated. Finally, the cost-benefit comparisons of the two extraction methods were further evaluated. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsAs for boiling method, when the hemoglobin concentration exceeded 30 g/L, HPV positive control could not be detected, nevertheless, the HPV positive control can still be detected even when the hemoglobin concentration reached 60 g/L for magnetic bead method. In the paired small-scale (639 cases) experiment, results indicated that the positive detection rate of HPV using the magnetic bead method was significantly higher than that of the boiling method, with positive rates of 20.66% and 10.02% (P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, in the longitudinal large-scale analysis (16540 cases) reached the same conclusion. Compared with boiling method, the cost of magnetic bead method increased by 13.14%, however, the detection rate of HPV increased by 106.19%.
conclusionCompared to the boiling method, the magnetic bead-based nucleic acid extraction technique exhibited superior anti-interference capabilities and a significant higher detection rate for HPV. Furthermore, it is highly cost-effective. It is anticipated that the magnetic bead method will be fully adopted for HPV detection in place of the boiling method in the future. Of course, more research is needed to verify this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.