ArticleTrials2025
Study protocol for a multicenter, multinational prospective randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes in subjects with Gram-negative bacteremia who have blood culture evaluation using Fast Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing vs. standard of care testing: the FAST trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06174649 (Fast Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for Gram Negative Bacteremia Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fast Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing for Gram Negative Bacteremia Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNovel, rapid blood culture diagnostics can provide faster antibiotic susceptibility results (AST) compared to standard methods but their impact on clinical outcomes is unclear and not assessed in many prospective clinical trials.
methodsThis study is a two-arm, multicenter, multinational, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in countries with high antibiotic resistance rates including Greece, India, Israel, and Spain. Nine hundred hospitalized subjects who have blood cultures collected as part of routine clinical care with growth of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) will be randomized 1:1 to blood culture evaluation using standard of care (SOC) AST vs. a rapid phenotypic AST method, VITEK REVEAL™ in addition to SOC AST. Subjects in both study arms will be reviewed by antibiotic stewardship clinicians who will recommend changes to antibiotic therapy, if indicated. The primary outcome is a composite three-category Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) defined using three ordered levels: alive without deleterious events, alive with at least one deleterious event, and death. Key secondary outcomes include mortality, length of stay, and time to antibiotic escalation or de-escalation within 3 days of randomization. Exploratory outcomes include a five-category DOOR, categorial agreement between VITEK REVEAL™ and SOC testing, clinician compliance with antibiotic stewardship recommendations, and desirability of treatment selection based on antibiotic spectrum, activity, and bloodstream isolate susceptibility profile (DOOR MAT). The primary analysis will be conducted on the modified intention-to-treat population. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate whether use of a rapid phenotypic AST method improves outcomes compared to use of conventional methods for patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections in clinical settings with high antibiotic resistance rates.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06174649. Registered on Dec 18 2023. PROTOCOL VERSION: Number 20-0021, version 5.0, 11-April-2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.