Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225461›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Characterizing dynamics of PRRSV RNA positivity over time in sows after live virus exposure and associated risk factors based on TOSc samples.

Peng Li, Paul Yeske, Swami Jayaraman, Danyang Zhang, Guilherme Arruda Cezar, Mafalda Mil-Homens, Isadora Machado, Daniel C A Moraes, Thinh Tran Pham Tien, Mariah Negri Musskopf and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peng LiVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Paul YeskeSwine Vet Center, Saint Peter, MN, USA.
Swami JayaramanVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Danyang ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Guilherme Arruda CezarVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Mafalda Mil-HomensVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Isadora MachadoVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Daniel C A MoraesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Thinh Tran Pham TienVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Mariah Negri MusskopfVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Elisa De ContiVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Elly K KirwaVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Ching-Yang WangVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Gustavo S SilvaVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Giovani TrevisanVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA.
Daniel C L LinharesVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA. linhares@iastate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the sows constitute a major source of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection in piglets, undetected PRRSV in sows poses a significant challenge to the success of PRRSV control and elimination programs. The dynamics of PRRSV persistence in individual sows remains unanswered majorly because of the lack of practical individual sampling tools. The objective of this study was to characterize the dynamics of PRRSV RNA positivity in sows and associated risk factors using a practical Tonsil-Oral-Scrubbing (TOSc) collection method on sows over a complete reproductive cycle. This field study was conducted in a commercial breed-to-wean farm intending to eliminate PRRSV by herd closure and using live virus inoculation (LVI) for whole herd exposure after an outbreak. Pre- and post-LVI, periodic TOSc samplings at four-week intervals were performed on 275 conveniently selected sows with evenly distributed parity categories (Parity 0, parity 1-2, and parity 3 and above) and production phases categories (wean-breed, early gestation, middle gestation, late gestation, and farrowing) until 24 weeks post-LVI.

resultsOverall, PRRSV RNA positivity declined over time from the first sampling point- 2 days before LVI until the end of the trial. At 16 weeks post-LVI, the PRRSV RNA positivity reached 4.43%, below the defined threshold of a low prevalence scenario of 10% positivity, and remained low prevalence until the end of the study. In the low prevalence scenario, there was a rebound of positivity to 8.00% at 24 weeks post-LVI. Parity demonstrated a significant effect on PRRSV RNA positivity in sows. At a high prevalence scenario (>10% positivity), both P0 and P1-P2 groups constantly showed significantly higher PRRSV RNA positivity than the P3 + group (p<0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). The P0 positivity was consistently numerically higher than P1-P2. The production phase effect was evident when the herd reached low prevalence (<10% positivity); sows in farrowing had consistently higher PRRSV RNA positivity than sows in other production phases. The mean positivity increased to 28.56% and 34.49% in the farrowing group at 20 weeks post-LVI and 24 weeks post-LVI, respectively.

conclusionsPRRSV RNA positivity in sows based on TOSc samples decreased over time and reached low prevalence at 16 weeks post-LVI. PRRSV RNA positivity decreased significantly with the increase in parity. And the production phase effect on PRRSV RNA positivity was more evident at low prevalence compared to high prevalence scenarios.

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusRNA, ViralAnimalsFemalePregnancyRisk FactorsSwineRNA, ViralAcross timeDetectionParityProduction phasePRRSVSowsTOSc

Identifiers

PMID41225461
PMCPMC12613344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.