ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures in geriatric patients: a retrospective cohort study assessing functional outcomes and complication rates.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Correction: Intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures in geriatric patients: a retrospective cohort study assessing functional outcomes and complication rates.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHumeral shaft fractures, accounting for 1-3% of adult fractures, increasingly require surgical intervention due to high nonunion rates. This study compares outcomes of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in older adults.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 patients with humeral shaft fractures treated at the Mohamed Taieb Kassab Orthopedic Institute between 2014 and 2022. The cohort included 32 patients managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN) and 23 with dynamic compression plating (DCP). Demographics, fracture characteristics (AO classification), operative duration, union duration, functional outcomes (modified Stewart and Hundley criteria, Constant-Murley score), and complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis used SPSS v19.0.
resultsMean age was 64.7 years, with male predominance (40 male, 15 female and a gender ratio of 2.6). IMN was preferred for middle-third (58%) and AO type A fractures (79.4%), while DCP dominated complex fractures (76.2% type B/C with p < 0.05).IMN demonstrated shorter operative duration (60.2 ± 4.4 vs. 105.9 ± 7.7 min and p < 0.001). Fracture union averaged 19.9 ± 7.9 weeks, with no intergroup difference (p = 0.360). Functional outcomes (76.4% good or excellent) were comparable between techniques (p > 0.05), but DCP yielded superior Constant-Murley scores (91.1 ± 10.5 vs. 80.6 ± 15.4 and p = 0.007). Complications included shoulder stiffness (25% IMN, 0% DCP and p = 0.015), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) (15.6% IMN, 0% DCP), sepsis (4.3% DCP, 0% IMN), and radial nerve palsy (4.3% DCP, 0% IMN).
conclusionIMN offers faster surgery and lower infection risk but higher shoulder morbidity. Plate fixation excels in complex fractures with better functional scores but longer operative duration and infection risk. Considering these factors, DCP may be the preferred approach in older adults compared to IMN, particularly when functional optimization is a priority. The choice of surgical technique should be guided by fracture characteristics, patient's specific factors, and surgeon expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.