Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225404›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Knowledge, attitudes, practice and factors associated with the prevalence of modern contraceptives use among women from historically marginalized community in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.

Jean Bosco Henri Hitayezu, Ronah Uwamahoro, Marie Laetitia Ishimwe Bazakare, Zephanie Nzeyimana, Gerard Kaberuka, Vital Mutijima, Jean Damascene Twagirumukiza, Justine Bagirisano, Gallican Rwibasira, Tafadzwa Dzinamarira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean Bosco Henri HitayezuCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. hitab88@gmail.com.
Ronah UwamahoroThe Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Kigali, Rwanda.
Marie Laetitia Ishimwe BazakareSingle Project Implementation Unit, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Zephanie NzeyimanaRwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Gerard KaberukaSingle Project Implementation Unit, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Vital MutijimaUniversity Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Damascene TwagirumukizaInkuru Nziza Orthopedic Specialized Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Justine BagirisanoCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Gallican RwibasiraRwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Tafadzwa DzinamariraICAP at Columbia University, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of modern contraceptive methods can reduce up to 68% of unintended pregnancies and significantly lower maternal deaths. In Rwanda, modern contraceptive use has increased from 10% to 58%. Historically marginalized people (HMPs), who make up 0.3% of the population, have faced persistent social exclusion, limited economic opportunities, and inadequate access to education and healthcare. Despite national efforts to expand family planning services, HMPs continue to experience high unmet needs, lower educational attainment, and restricted access to reproductive health services. However, data on modern contraceptive use among this group remains limited. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and factors influencing the use of modern contraceptives among marginalized women in Rwanda.

methodsThis was a quantitative cross-sectional study conducted in 5 districts of Rwanda. Multistage sampling was used to select 385 respondents- women of reproductive age (15-49) living in marginalized communities. Data was collected using a researcher administered structured questionnaire that was developed and pretested. Date was analyzed using STATA version 18. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test and logistic regression were used during data analysis.

resultsAmong the 385 participants, 89.1% had poor knowledge of modern contraception, though 80% demonstrated positive attitudes toward its use. The overall usage rate was 67.9%, with implants being the most commonly used method (61.6%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that Women aged 15-24 were 4.4 times more likely to use modern contraception compared to those aged 35 and above (AOR = 4.38; 95% CI: 1.67-11.53; p = 0.003). Similarly, women aged 25-34 were nearly 3 times more likely to use modern contraception than those aged 35 and above (AOR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.57-6.57; p = 0.008). Married women had a 3.2 times higher likelihood of using modern contraception compared to cohabiting women (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI: 1.45-7.06; p = 0.004). Divorced or separated women were also significantly more likely to use modern contraception (AOR = 5.46; 95% CI: 2.00-14.88; p = 0.001), and those with prior modern contraceptive use (AOR = 4.88; 95% CI: 2.42-9.81; p < 0.001). Additionally, women who had discussed family planning with their partners were nearly three times more likely to use it (AOR = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.42-6.25; p = 0.004).

conclusionThe community of the historically marginalized people has limited knowledge of modern contraception surprisingly with high prevalence of modern contraceptive methods compared to indigenous people from other regions. Therefore, there is a need of consistently promoting Sexual and reproductive health education in this community more especially among adolescents and young adult women.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial MarginalizationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHistorically marginalized peopleModern contraception methods

Identifiers

PMID41225404
PMCPMC12613619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.