Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225357›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2025

Double-negative NMOSD: from case report to a proposed diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm.

Giuseppe Romano, Giacomo Lus, Mario Cirillo, Cinzia Coppola, Simona Bonavita, Elisabetta Signoriello

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe RomanoSecond Division of Neurology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giacomo LusSecond Division of Neurology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mario CirilloMRI Research Center SUN-FISM, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Cinzia CoppolaSecond Division of Neurology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Simona BonavitaSecond Division of Neurology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Elisabetta SignorielloSecond Division of Neurology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. elisabetta.signoriello@unicampania.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDouble seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (DN-NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, typically involving the optic nerve and spinal cord, characterized by negativity for anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG antibodies. OBJECTIVES AND

methodsA 35-year-old man with optic neuritis and recurrent myelitis, negative for AQP4 and MOG antibodies, was diagnosed with double seronegative NMOSD (DN-NMOSD). Initial treatment with Rituximab led to temporary stability, but relapses in 2021 and 2022 prompted a switch to Satralizumab (anti-IL-6R), achieving two years of clinical and radiological stability. DISCUSSIONS AND

conclusionsThis case underscores the therapeutic potential of anti-IL-6 drugs for DN-NMOSD, especially when anti-CD20 therapies fail. It highlights the heterogeneity of DN-NMOSD and the need for novel biomarkers, such as GFAP, tau, and IL-6, to better understand disease mechanisms and guide targeted treatments. A structured therapeutic approach, starting with anti-CD20 drugs and progressing to anti-IL-6 agents if ineffective, may optimize outcomes in this poorly understood condition.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeuromyelitis OpticaAdultAutoantibodiesHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleRituximabAutoantibodiesImmunologic FactorsRituximabBiomarkersDisease modifying therapies (DMT)Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (DN-NMOSD)

Identifiers

PMID41225357
PMCPMC12613506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.