ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Clinical performance of a dual-target SARS CoV-2 antibody assay using sera from Ghana.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the pandemic, numerous serological tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) have been developed. However, limited data exist on the clinical performance of these immunoassays with sera from Africa. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical performance characteristics of a lateral flow IgG antibody test using serum and plasma samples from Ghana.
methodWe assessed the performance of the COVID-19 Sero-NP/RBD test, a dual-target lateral flow assay designed to simultaneously detect IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and spike receptor-binding domain (RBD). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were determined using pre-pandemic plasma samples (N = 300) and samples from recovered COVID-19 patients with varying symptom severity (N = 308). Test performance was further analyzed in relation to antibody concentration.
resultsThe combined detection of anti-RBD and anti-NP antibodies yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI: 94.1–98.4) and a specificity of 99.0% (95% CI: 97.1–99.8). Combined antigen detection significantly outperformed individual antigen targets (p < 0.001), with RBD-targeted responses demonstrating higher sensitivity than NP alone. Sensitivity declined with lower antibody titres, decreasing to 86.0% for samples with ≤ 25 BAU/mL and to 57.0% for those with ≤ 7.5 BAU/mL when either antigen was used alone.
conclusionThe COVID-19 Sero-NP/RBD lateral flow test demonstrated high accuracy in detecting past SARS CoV-2 infection in sera from Ghana. Dual-antigen targeting enhanced diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in individuals with low antibody titres. This assay may serve as a practical tool for assessing individual serostatus and monitoring population-level seroprevalence in Ghana and similar African settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.