ArticleBMC primary care2025
Development and testing of an electronic frailty index using Canadian electronic medical record data in primary care.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a state of increased vulnerability from physical, social, and cognitive factors and can result in several negative health outcomes at an individual and systemic level. Existing electronic medical record (EMR) data can be optimized to identify patients' frailty level in primary care to facilitate early intervention and management of frailty in an efficient manner. The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a Canadian electronic frailty index (eFI) using primary care EMR data.
methodsWe built a Canadian eFI based on the existing UK 36-factor eFI and tested it using EMR data from British Columbia (BC) primary care practices. We used a retrospective cross-sectional design to examine the concurrent criterion validity of the eFI by testing the hypotheses that increasing frailty is associated with (1) higher numbers of primary care visits, (2) increased presence of polypharmacy, and (3) increased presence of cognitive impairment. Hypotheses were tested using Poisson and Logistic regression modelling. The data source for analysis was the BC-Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.
resultsOur frailty algorithm was successful in its ability to calculate frailty scores for patients. A total of 15,178 patients met eligibility criteria from 22 primary care practices and 108 care providers. Ages ranged from 65 to 109 (mean 75.7); 54.2% were females. The number of frailty factors detected for patients ranged from 0 to 28 (mean 7.1). Analyses showed significant associations (p < 0.0001) between frailty levels and increasing age, material deprivation, and social deprivation. There were significant associations (p < 0.0001) between increasing frailty scores and our three outcomes. Individuals who were severely frail had nine more annual primary care visits, nine times the odds of concurrent polypharmacy, and approximately double the odds of cognitive impairment than someone who was not frail.
conclusionsOur study provides evidence for initial implementation of the eFI in primary care. There is significant potential for EMR data to facilitate early detection of frailty and drive care planning with healthcare teams. Integrating the eFI within primary care provides a tremendous opportunity to screen and manage frailty with the long-term goal of reducing negative patient health outcomes and often unnecessary healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.