ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Living with Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy from a patient perspective.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive condition for which disease-modifying therapies are increasingly available. However, limited research has explored the patient experience with ATTR-CM and its impact on quality of life.
methodsIn this single-center qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with ten participants (either with ATTR-CM or at-risk family members). At-risk family members were defined as asymptomatic individuals with a clinically actionable TTR variant that were identified through cascade genetic testing. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a hybrid deductive and inductive approach. Two independent experts assessed participants' knowledge of ATTR-CM.
resultsFour exploratory themes emerged regarding the ATTR-CM patient journey. Participants demonstrated moderate to excellent knowledge of disease and an appropriate level of confidence. Diagnostic delays were a major source of frustration and were largely attributed to limited knowledge among non-specialist providers. While these providers often recognized that something was wrong, they struggled with appropriate diagnostic work-up and timely specialist referrals. Patients also noted disparities in ATTR-CM care based on geography, race, and socioeconomic status. Reactions to support groups were mixed, with concerns about re-traumatization being most prominent.
conclusionsThis qualitative study explores aspects of the ATTR-CM patient experience not captured through conventional clinical pathways. Diagnostic delays appeared to be driven by non-specialist provider knowledge gaps and systemic disparities in access to specialized care. These preliminary insights may inform the design of multidisciplinary care models that better reflect patient needs and priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.