ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Psychological resilience in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients: Trajectories and influencing factors.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo identify different classes of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients based on heterogeneous trajectories of psychological resilience and influencing factors of different classes.
methodsFrom October 2022 to December 2023, 388 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients were included. Baseline assessment (T0) data were collected at the first day of hospitalization, including demographic, clinical characteristics, psychological (psychological resilience, symptom burden, anxiety, medical coping styles), and social (social support) factors. Measurements were repeated at 3 days after surgery (T1), the day of hospital discharge (T2), 3 months post-discharge (T3), 6 months post-discharge (T4), and 1 year post-discharge (T5). A latent class growth model (LCGM) was used to define different classes of trajectories of psychological resilience.
resultsData from 333 patients were analyzed. The three latent classes had a similar pattern across different intercepts, with a significant decrease from T0 to T2, followed by a significant increase from T2 to T5, and with T5 being higher than T0. The three trajectories were named Class 1 (sustained high), Class 2 (rapid recovery), and Class 3 (slow recovery), respectively. Multiple logistic regressions showed that Class 1 (sustained high) predicted higher social support, aged 20 ~ 40, being male and a civil servant, and Class 2 (rapid recovery), and Class 3 (slow recovery) predicted higher anxiety and resignation coping compared to Class 1.
conclusionHealthcare providers should pay attention to periods of declining psychological resilience and implement interventions for vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41225256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.