ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Effectiveness of the aspiration method in preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot study on the efficacy of cyanoacrylate glue in preventing post-ESD bleeding at the gastric angle.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery using the Toumai® system: initial experience and technical considerations from a single center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelayed bleeding is a severe complication of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a study to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of a simple aspiration method for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric ESD.
methodsThe clinical, endoscopic and pathological data of patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer and other gastric lesions at our center from January 2022 to December 2024 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent aspiration method were categorized into the aspiration group, and those without aspiration method were included in the control group. The incidences of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding were compared between two groups.
resultsThree hundred sixty-four patients with 364 lesions were included in this study. 143 were enrolled in the aspiration group and 221 were enrolled in the control group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are comparable. The incidence of massive delayed bleeding and overall delayed bleeding was significantly lower in the aspiration group compared to control group (0.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.018 for massive delayed bleeding; 7.0 vs. 15.4%, P = 0.016 for overall delayed bleeding), especially in lesions located in the middle and lower thirds of the stomach (0.9 vs. 6.8%, P = 0.044 for massive delayed bleeding, 7.3 vs. 16.8%, P = 0.024 for overall bleeding), lesions with longer procedure duration (0 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.020 for massive delayed bleeding, 10.3 vs. 24.6%, P = 0.018 for overall bleeding), and lesions performed by experienced endoscopists (1.0 vs. 7.7%, P = 0.040 for massive delayed bleeding, 9.2 vs. 19.0%, P = 0.036 for overall bleeding).
conclusionsOur study suggested that the aspiration method was a simple, safe, and effective method for preventing delayed bleeding following gastric ESD, particularly in lesions with high-risk factors for delayed bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.