ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
SPEED-TR: a self-distilled and pre-trained transformer model for enhanced ECG detection of tricuspid regurgitation.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ECG foundation model for generalizable cardiac function prediction across the lifespan.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic Modeling of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Outcomes Using Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains underdiagnosed due to the lack of effective screening tools. We developed a self-distilled and pre-trained transformer model for detecting TR (SPEED-TR) from electrocardiography. The model was trained using 466,149 electrocardiogram-echocardiogram pairs from 291,673 patients and validated in one internal (63,925 patients) and two external cohorts (44,951 and 21,300 patients). SPEED-TR accurately detected moderate-to-severe TR in the hold-out set (AUROC 0.945, NPV 0.983; specificity 0.973) and maintained stable performance in multi-center testing sets (AUROCs 0.939-0.943; NPVs 0.978-0.988). Three thresholds enabled SPEED-TR severity grading: none (0-0.008), mild (0.008-0.255), moderate (0.255-0.755), and severe (0.755-1), achieving accuracies of 0.749 (hold-out), 0.730 (internal), 0.775 and 0.726 (external), with overall accuracy of 0.744. SPEED-TR remained robust in patients with 1 to ≥3 risk factors and 1 to ≥2 valvular diseases. SPEED-TR demonstrated potential as a screening tool and may provide reference for TR severity assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.