ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Equipping mathematical models for hospital dynamics using information theory.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose metrics from information theory to characterize the clinical and operational dynamics of hospitals. Ergodicity, the equality of time- and space-averages within a dynamical system, ensures its stationarity. Surprisal, the log-inverse of probability, and entropy, the average surprisal, provide mathematical insights into the nature of dynamical systems. We applied these metrics to lab test order times from 15 units in three hospitals from 2018 to 2021. We found hospital units were ergodic in the sense that each bed is typical of the unit, while hospitals were not, and that external forces like the COVID-19 pandemic can perturb hospital dynamics. These information-theoretic metrics can indicate systemic shifts, inefficiencies, and anomalies in patient care, providing granular and interpretable signals of change. Monitoring these metrics can expose data drift, where evolving inputs and outputs hinder generalizability, and label leakage, where clinician actions inadvertently corrupt predictive monitoring systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.