ArticleLearning & behavior2026
Visual perception of rotated chromatic and achromatic 3D stimuli in goldfish (Carassius auratus).
Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental and Physiological Regulation of Reproduction in the Goldfish: Gonadal Development, Maturation, and Spawning Behavior: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to visually recognize objects despite differences in orientation would be advantageous for fish because they see objects from many viewpoints as they navigate their three-dimensional aquatic environment. We tested the ability of goldfish to recognize 3D chromatic and achromatic stimuli from four aspect angles in three rotation planes using a two-alternative forced-choice task. The fish were trained to discriminate between plastic models of a frog and turtle at 0°, then tested with the same objects at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°. In Experiments 1 and 2, the stimuli were presented in color, whereas in Experiment 3, the same stimuli were painted black. In Experiment 1, the fish performed significantly better than chance at all aspect angles (0°, ±90°, 180°) and in all three rotation planes. The goldfish displayed viewpoint-invariant performance in the picture plane, but showed enhanced performance at 0° for the two depth plane rotations, which suggests some viewpoint-dependent processes. In Experiment 2, performance accuracy was high regardless of whether the reinforced stimulus (S+) or the non-reinforced stimulus (S-) was rotated in the picture plane. In Experiment 3, two of four fish were successful in recognizing rotated achromatic stimuli. These results, taken together with other studies, suggest that goldfish more easily achieve visual object constancy when the stimuli contain surface features (color, texture, shading).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.