ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Modulating the Allergen-Specific Immune Response to Achieve Remission of Food Allergy Through Oral Immunotherapy.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical remission in allergy and clinical immunology practice: State of the art and World Allergy Organization (WAO) call to action.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Review
- How to Employ Trained Immunity and Trained Immunity-Based Vaccines to Inhibit Allergic Inflammation.Vaccines · 2026Review
- The Potential Link Between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Food Allergy: Inflammatory Pathogenesis and Management.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food allergies represent a significant global health issue, affecting approximately 2% of children and up to 10% of 1-year-old infants. Oral immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for food allergies. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is effective at inducing desensitization, defined as a temporary increase in reaction threshold to food allergens, and a low-dose OIT approach (Palforzia) is now approved in several regions, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. However, the ability for OIT to induce sustained unresponsiveness or remission, defined as the ability to tolerate the allergen without ongoing treatment or avoidance, is less certain and may depend on the OIT dosing regimen that is applied; for example, high-dose peanut OIT regimens have been shown to induce remission in ~30-74% of treated patients. Desensitization offers temporary protection against accidental exposure to allergens; however, drawbacks include the need for indefinite maintenance dosing and continuing allergen avoidance. Additionally, data show that desensitization does not improve health-related quality of life compared with a placebo. In contrast, remission allows participants to discontinue treatment, eat the allergen freely, and leads to substantial improvement in quality of life. This chapter examines the immune mechanisms driving food allergy pathogenesis and the mechanisms that support remission following OIT. Gene expression studies in patient samples from clinical OIT trials have provided insight into the immune pathways involved in redirecting the allergic response toward tolerance, with changes in allergen-reactive T cells, B cells, and baseline signatures. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the immune changes underlying food allergy and the immune mechanisms of OIT that lead to remission of allergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41225120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.