ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Evaluating the Impact of Clear Dental Aligners on Dental and Periodontal Conditions, Oral Microbial Patterns, and the Immune System.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has gained widespread adoption for managing malocclusions, primarily due to its aesthetic advantages, improved access for hygiene, and enhanced patient comfort relative to fixed appliances (FAs). However, CAT introduces a distinct intraoral environment that can influence microbial composition, biofilm development, and host immune responses. This chapter explores the effects of clear aligners on dental and periodontal health, oral microbial communities, and immunological parameters. Evidence indicates that CAT may facilitate plaque and biofilm accumulation, particularly on composite attachments, thereby increasing the risk of white spot lesions (WSLs), gingivitis, and dental caries. Despite these risks, aligners are generally associated with lower levels of pathogenic bacteria compared to FAs. Microbiome analyses of subgingival plaque and saliva reveal shifts in bacterial genera and phyla, although these changes are frequently non-pathogenic. CAT has demonstrated minimal negative effects on clinical periodontal indices, including the plaque index and gingival bleeding index, particularly when effective oral hygiene is maintained. Furthermore, aligners may reduce sustained immune activation by limiting plaque retention and aseptic inflammation, potentially decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Although hypersensitivity reactions to aligner materials are infrequent, they warrant consideration. Overall, CAT appears to support periodontal health and promote a more stable oral microbial environment compared to FAs. Continued patient adherence to hygiene protocols and further long-term studies are necessary to fully evaluate systemic implications and optimize clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41225118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.