ArticleScientific reports2025
Data-driven design guide for vibrotactile display layouts by continuous mapping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile displays are emerging as vital components across fields such as medical technology, assistive technology, virtual reality, infotech and gaming, yet their design remains hampered by an inadequate psychophysical foundation. In this work, we critically assess current tactile display research, uncovering gaps in spatial acuity data, and introduce robust, data-driven layout guidelines for vibrotactile displays (VTDs). We collected high-resolution vibrotactile data from 33 participants across five large-area body sites using a novel, fully automated experimental framework that employs Bayesian adaptive parameter estimation to generate continuous psychometric functions. This approach allows us to derive thresholds at any recognition rate, thereby overcoming the limitations of traditional, discrete measures. Our findings reveal that existing datasets are scattered and inconsistent, demonstrate a pronounced horizontal anisotropy especially near the body midline and expose a marked sensitivity gradient along the lower back. These insights provide a validated psychophysical basis for VTD development, paving the way for more reliable, user-centric designs in next-generation tactile interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.