ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based method for analyzing stress distribution in a ship.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ship structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are essential for ensuring operational safety. Monitoring stress distribution is a critical function of such systems. Analysis of stress data collected by pressure sensors can enhance understanding of SHM performance and facilitate the prevention of structural failures. In this study, we propose a machine learning-based computational method to analyze the stress distribution of a crane ship. The method first employed extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to evaluate relationships among stress data from multiple pressure sensors, and then used multilayer perceptron (MLP) to construct regression models. For each pressure sensor, an optimal MLP regression model was established to infer its stress values from those of related sensors. These models demonstrated strong fitting performance on both training and independent test datasets. Furthermore, the method identified key pressure sensors whose measurements were particularly important for recovering stresses at most monitoring points. These findings improve interpretability of the method and provide insights into the mechanisms of the monitoring system. The robustness and rationality of the approach were further examined through ablation tests, confirming its effectiveness for ship SHM applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.