Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy and safety of emulsified microsomal ferric pyrophosphate vs. Ferrous Ascorbate in pregnancy with iron-deficiency anemia- a randomized, comparative study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of emulsified microsomal Ferric pyrophosphate (EMFP/SunActive™ Fe, 27 mg elemental iron) versus Ferrous Ascorbate (100 mg elemental iron) in second-trimester pregnant women with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) for 4 weeks. Pregnant women aged 20-35 years with a singleton pregnancy, hemoglobin (Hb) 9-10.5 g/dL, and ferritin < 15 mcg/L were enrolled. The test group showed zero adverse effects vs. the control group, having 11.1% adverse events. The gastrointestinal(GI) adverse symptoms, including nausea, dark stools, and hyperacidity, were reported only in the Ferrous Ascorbate group, indicating superior tolerability and safety of EMFP tablets. Both groups showed similar improvements in Hb (Δ2.63 g/dL vs. Δ2.62 g/dL) and serum ferritin (61.09% vs. 61.92%). Reticulocyte hemoglobin (RET-He) increased by 20.5% in the test group and 16.2% in the control group, with no significant difference. Clinical symptoms such as dizziness, fatigue, and palpitations improved with greater magnitude in the test group. It was inferred that the test group receiving EMFP was as effective as the control group in improving efficacy endpoints at a significantly lower dose (1/3rd dose compared to ascorbate). EMFP showed better tolerability, safety and compliance, making it a promising option for managing IDA in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.