Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224944›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Breeding progress of grain and forage maize in long-term variety trials compared to on-farm yield development.

F Laidig, T Feike, H Brandes, H-P Piepho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F LaidigBiostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany. Friedrich.Laidig@uni-hohenheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-549X
T FeikeJulius Kühn Institute - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Stahnsdorfer Damm 81, 14532, Kleinmachnow, Germany.
H BrandesBundessortenamt, Osterfelddamm 60, 30627, Hannover, Germany.
H-P PiephoBiostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

BMEL FoodBMEL Regional Identity (BMLEH) as part of the German Climate Protection Program 2022.BMEL Til Feike was supported by the project KlimaN funded by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageYield gaps between variety trials and on-farm yields show diverging trends for grain versus forage maize in Germany in 1987-2023. The yield gap between variety trials and on-farm reduced for grain yield from 30% (1987) to 23% (2023), while for forage maize dry matter yield increased from 15% (1987) to 32% (2023). In variety trials during the same period starch yield in forage maize showed a moderate increase of 14%, while digestibility and starch content did not change over time. N use efficiency in variety trials was improved by 35%, 27% and 18% for grain, dry matter and starch yield, respectively, while N yield in dry matter did not change over time. Maize cultivation increased significantly in Germany over the past 25 years. With a share of over 20% of arable land, maize has become the second most important crop after wheat, primarily due to the growing demand for biogas production. Based on long-term variety trials for grain and forage maize, we quantified breeding progress applying mixed linear models extended by linear and nonlinear regression terms to estimate time trends between 1987 and 2023. Grain yield increased by 33.4 dt ha

Indexed as

Edible GrainPlant BreedingZea maysAgricultureGermanyStarchStarch

Identifiers

PMID41224944
PMCPMC12612010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.