ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Osteochondrosis in children and adolescents].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteochondrosis in children and adolescents is a group of diseases and not a variant of growth. They often occur during periods of rapid growth, with predilection sites at many epiphyses and apophyses as well as along the growth plates. There is a classic age of onset for each of the many different diseases.
objectivesPresentation of the most important entities (Perthes disease, Köhler I disease, Sever's disease, Osgood-Schlatter disease, Sinding-Larsen-Johansen disease, Scheuermann's disease). MATERIALS AND
methodsPresentation of the entities mentioned with the clinical presentation and a brief overview of the therapy; radiological changes are illustrated.
resultsIn various cases, the diagnosis can be made solely on clinical grounds. If imaging is necessary, conventional X‑rays are usually taken. In Perthes disease, a magnetic resonance imaging scan is indicated in the early stages of the disease.
conclusionIt is important to be aware of the predilection sites and the age of manifestation of the respective disease. If treatment is necessary, it will be based on the radiological changes, among other things. Correct implementation and diagnosis (in close cooperation with the clinical colleagues) are therefore essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41224942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.