ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating transfer learning with scalogram analysis for blood pressure estimation from PPG signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of dataset integrity, calibration and signal quality in neural network-based blood pressure estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating transfer learning with scalogram analysis for blood pressure estimation from PPG signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The blood pressure (BP) estimation plays a crucial role in assessing cardiovascular health and preventing related complications. One of the early warning indicators for heart disorders is elevated blood pressure. Thus, monitoring of blood pressure continuously is needed. The study aims to develop and validate a reliable deep learning-based approach for blood pressure estimation using photoplethysmography from the publicly available database MIMIC-II. The continuous wavelet transform (CWT) was used to transform the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals into scalograms, which were then input into six different deep learning models: VGG16, ResNet50, InceptionV3, NASNetLarge, InceptionResNetV2 and ConvNeXtTiny. The obtained deep features from each one of these models were employed to estimate BP values using random forest. The proposed approach uses a unique transfer learning framework that integrates deep feature extraction from scalograms with random forest regression, providing a new pathway for blood pressure estimation. The models were assessed using mean absolute error (MAE) and standard deviation (SD) in estimating the systolic and diastolic blood pressure values. Out of six models, ConvNeXtTiny and VGG16 showed good performance. ConvNeXtTiny achieved mean absolute error of 2.95 mmHg and standard deviation of 4.11 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and mean absolute error of 1.66 mmHg and standard deviation of 2.60 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The achieved result complies with the clinical standards set by Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Standard (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society standard (BHS). This can enhance cardiovascular health monitoring with continuous, non-invasive and reliable blood pressure measurement, assisting in early detection of the disease. The suggested method shows that reliable blood pressure estimation from photoplethysmography signals is possible with the use of deep learning and transfer learning. Above all, ConvNeXtTiny offers a dependable method for continuous blood pressure monitoring that satisfies clinical requirements and may help in the early identification of cardiovascular problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.