ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal deep learning for midpalatal suture assessment in maxillary expansion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate midpalatal suture maturation assessment is critical for orthodontic treatment planning, yet current manual staging methods exhibit substantial inter-examiner variability (kappa values 0.3-0.8), compromising treatment decision reliability. This study developed and validated DeepMSM, an automated multimodal deep learning framework integrating cone-beam computed tomography with clinical indicators for standardized midpalatal suture staging. We retrospectively analyzed cone-beam computed tomography and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 200 orthodontic patients aged 7-36 years. The DeepMSM framework integrated multimodal images with clinical variables including age, gender, cervical vertebral maturation stage, and mandibular third molar stage using attention-based fusion strategies. DeepMSM achieved 93.75% accuracy and 93.81% F1-score, substantially outperforming single-modality approaches (47.50%-71.25% accuracy) and dual-modality models (73.75-81.25% accuracy). The system demonstrated excellent performance in distinguishing critical stages C and D with F1-scores of 92%-93%, representing the decision point between conventional expansion and surgical intervention. All clinical parameters showed significant correlations with midpalatal suture maturation (p<0.05). DeepMSM, a novel multimodal midpalatal suture maturation assessment system, achieved a high accuracy of 93.75%, demonstrating the potential to reduce diagnostic variability and improve treatment reliability. This automated framework particularly benefits less experienced clinicians in making critical treatment decisions for maxillary expansion therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.