ArticleScientific reports2025
A graph neural network model for inferring interindividual variation from experimental biological data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visualizing the multidimensional landscape of biological variation in modern microscopy.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interindividual variation in biological responses to physiological stimuli is a widely recognized phenomenon. However, effective computational tools for identifying the individual-specific mechanisms remain limited. We present the bioreaction-variation network, a graph neural network (GNN) model designed to infer hidden molecular and physiological relationships underlying such variation in experimental biological data. To ensure applicability at a laboratory scale, the model was trained on a domain-specific corpus constructed from approximately 65 K published studies containing the keyword "skeletal muscle". The architecture comprises five layers with a multi-head attention mechanism and a multi-layer perceptron, enabling the model to capture both local topological features and directional dominance between connected nodes. The GNN was trained to learn relationships from experimental models to target features, as well as among target features. Using real experimental input consisting of differential gene expression data from mouse skeletal muscle subjected to acute exercise, the model successfully inferred individualized networks, identifying both common and unique paths across individuals based on input experimental context. These results demonstrate the model's capacity to extract interpretable, individual-specific biological connectivity patterns. The proposed framework serves as a proof of concept for customizable, context-based GNN inference designed to address biological variation at the individual level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.