ArticleScientific reports2025
Applying high-performance resins in stereolitography printing to produce prototype injection moulds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) revolutionised the modern plastics industry. Its flexibility and ability to build almost any complex geometry without the need for conventional tooling or machining is especially desirable. In our article, we analysed two resins which can be processed by vat photopolymerisation: High Temperature and Rigid10K. They are especially recommended for rapid tooling because of their resistance to heat loads, high strength and stiffness. The application of vat photopolymerisation to produce prototype injection moulds is a definite novelty because the international research community has not realised the potential of this AM technology in rapid tooling. We performed dynamic mechanical analysis in temperature sweep and creep time temperature superposition (TTS) modes to determine the temperature-dependent stiffness and creep characteristics of the resins. The storage modulus of the High Temp resin was 2960 MPa at room temperature while it was 4055 MPa for Rigid10K. Their difference in storage modulus gradually diminished as they were heated to 123 °C. Above that, the High Temp resin showed higher modulus. The creep compliance of Rigid10K was considerably lower compared to the High Temp resin until 90 °C but it was excessive above that. After the material tests, two injection mould inserts were printed and post-cured. The inserts were fitted with strain gauges and thermocouples, which measured the operational deformations and the temperature of the inserts during injection moulding. The Rigid10K insert showed nearly an order of magnitude lower maximum deformation than the High Temp insert. The Rigid10K insert endured the injection moulding test while the High Temp insert cracked. The results proved that both resins are applicable in prototype injection mould making, but the durability of the Rigid10K insert is considerably better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.