ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel rapid surface projection localization technique (RSPLT) using 3D slicer and smartphone-assisted registration for keyhole evacuation of intracerebral hematomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a novel rapid surface projection localization technique (RSPLT) using 3D Slicer and smartphone-assisted registration for precise keyhole evacuation of intracerebral hematomas. Technical workflow of RSPLT was established: (1) 3D Slicer-based hematoma reconstruction and sagittal plane optimization; (2) Transparent overlay of hematoma contours onto scalp morphology; (3) Smartphone-leveler guided via anatomical landmarks. The technique was applied in 28 consecutive ICH cases, with intraoperative validation of localization accuracy. RSPLT achieved complete hematoma projection within 7.98 ± 1.18 min (range 6.1-9.8 min). Intraoperative validation using caliper measurement confirmed sub-millimeter surface landmark registration error (1.2 ± 0.3 mm). The technique enabled minimal access (bone window 3.10 ± 0.63 cm, range 2.3-5.4 cm) with 95.31 ± 5.56% clearance (range 78.2-99.74%), suggesting it may offer a potentially more efficient alternative to conventional CT-guided planning. Postoperative ADL scores improved significantly from 53.12 ± 5.63 to 83.17 ± 9.54 at three months. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that RSPLT can provide a rapid, low-cost, and accurate approach for hematoma spatial mapping, which may aid in the precision of keyhole trajectory design. These preliminary from a single-center experience findings warrant further comparative studies to validate its clinical utility against existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.